Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Torture in "Civilized" Society
In Michael Foucault "Discipline and Punishment" various forms of torture from physical to psychological are given in gruesome and raw detail, but the truest and most frightening thing is that all forms of such barbaric atrocity were condoned by a society that for the most part was and still is in historical hindsight viewed as civilized. The executioner in Damian's story "The Body of the Condemned" is painted as a poor person caught in the middle, forced to do this job because he has no choice, until the knowledge is given that he wished to keep a lock of Damian's hair as a souvenir which he is denied due to his poor performance in not giving Damian a quick death. This paints the executioner and even the preachers whose function is to hear Damian's confession of guilt as even worse than Damian in that by putting a human being, even someone who did or tried to do a heinous crime through such a horrendous series of tortures, they are putting themselves on a moral level as less than human. This can be also brought into play in the medieval practice of making a convicted person be brought before the town to be mocked and ridiculed before their death sentence was carried out, which is the focus of The Spectacle of the Scaffold, this idea of watching a person die and have it be a sick form of personal entertainment hasn't gone away even in 2013 where excessively violent media is put out for public consumption is condoned and even considered psychologically healthy as a way to purge are violent impulses. With that in mind does that make us any more civilized now than those older "civilized" societies?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
I really enjoyed reading this. After reading I thought a lot about our question. In my opinion, I think we are a little more civilized now than older civilized societies, but not as much as we think. I think you bring up a valid argument. Watching a person in pain or even die hasn't changed. We still see it today in the world. They even brought back jousting, which is very deadly, but draws attention. You are right about the media. Every time I turn on the news the big story is always about a murder or death (violence).
ReplyDeleteWow an embarrassing typo. I tried to press preview but pressed publish. Really sorry! It was supposed to say *your question not *our question
DeleteBlogs are supposed to have type-os! But seriously, I guess one of the hardest things about understanding Foucault's argument is that he tries to get us exactly away from the kind of question you are asking, Rose. He's not interested at all in making us feel like we have or have not made "progress" toward some humanitarian ideal. Rather, he is interested in describing how in fact societies have changed -- shifting to an interest in the "soul" more than the body of deviants -- and analyzing what those changes mean in terms of how power is exercised by the state and between individuals. This is a hard concept.
ReplyDelete